--- description: Learn more about LILT price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in South Africa. Read reviews from verified users and discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: LILT Price, Reviews & Features - Capterra South Africa 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Translation Software](/directory/30934/translation-management/software) > [LILT](/software/204322/lilt) # LILT Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.za/software/204322/lilt Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/204322/lilt?page=2) > LILT is the complete AI solution for enterprise content translation and creation. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 85 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses LILT? LILT serves customers across enterprise and consumer technology, retail and e-commerce, manufacturing, gaming, financial services, healthcare, and government. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.4/5** | 85 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: LILT ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Other - **Pricing Details**: Contact LILT for pricing information - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (On-Premise) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Collaboration Tools - Data Import/Export - Document Management - Localization Automation - Machine Translation - Multi-Language - Process/Workflow Automation - Project Management - Project Tracking - Self Service Portal - Speech Recognition - Terminology Management - Third-Party Integrations - Workflow Management ## Integrations (28 total) - Adobe Commerce - Adobe Experience Manager - Box - Braze - CaptionHub - Contentful - Crowdin - Drupal - Figma - Git - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud - Google Drive - Helpshift ... and 13 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Chat ## Category - [Translation Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/30934/translation-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Translation Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/30934/translation-management/software) - [Artificial Intelligence (AI) Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/30938/artificial-intelligence/software) - [Government Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/20048/government/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Google Translate](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/1013631/google-translate) — 4.5/5 (687 reviews) 2. [Bureau Works](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/189130/bureau-works) — 4.8/5 (118 reviews) 3. [Crowdin](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/163509/crowdin) — 4.7/5 (175 reviews) 4. [WPML](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/1021922/wpml) — 4.6/5 (163 reviews) 5. [DeepL Pro](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/219412/deepl-pro) — 4.7/5 (154 reviews) ## Reviews ### "My freelancer experience at Lilt" — 5.0/5 > **Roxzanne** | *04 April 2025* | Translation & Localization | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Very helpful and reactive team that always replied when I query something > > **Cons**: The system automatically calculates the time spent on your work and I was once almost short paid by $50 due to a system error > > Never had any issues that the team could not resolve ----- ### "A good company to work with." — 3.0/5 > **Mlungisi** | *05 April 2025* | Translation & Localization | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: They have a timely communication with the freelancers. > > **Cons**: There is a lot o documents to be signed. ----- ### "Happy to work with and willing to be part of" — 5.0/5 > **Michele Fardini Soares 👩🏻‍💻 ⚙️ 💡** | *04 April 2025* | Translation & Localization | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The opportunity to work with different accounts and fields. I can utilize my skills in the Life Sciences for one task, but in another, I can apply my skills to technology, the music industry, and social media. I have been learning a lot because I can exercise and gain new knowledge from this experience, as I am always willing to grow. > > **Cons**: When I receive an email from LILT announcing a project to work on, and after some milliseconds, it is already unavailable. It's frustrating, and I got upset. It is almost impossible to get the job. I try to do it on my smartphone (iPhone), but I often have page errors, telling me that Chrome, Safari, Mozilla, and other browsers are not compatible. I have already reported this issue to PMs and support, but I continue experiencing problems. Additionally, I would like to inform you about the payment terms. It took too much time to complete the job—some of them, more than 45 days. > > I am proud to work for LILT. I already know many people from the team, and I received support; everyone helped when it was necessary. I have consistently demonstrated my interest in being part of the LILT team. As an engineer passionate about technology and language, I have a clear plan to utilize my knowledge of project management to become a Project Manager at LILT. I hope to join the LILT team, working remotely and collaborating with a team. ----- ### "Make Lilt a Better Place for Translators and Clients" — 5.0/5 > **Ning** | *05 April 2025* | Translation & Localization | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Quick AI-enhanced TM-based machine tanslation and reliable and transparent payments. > > **Cons**: 1. The least I like about Lilt is its current task assignment mechanism, a first-come, first-served system triggered by email notifications. Seemingly simple and straightforward, it fosters an environment prone to inefficiency and potential abuse. This system incentivizes a "race to the bottom," where translators may accept projects exceeding their expertise or available time simply to secure work. This ultimately risks delivering subpar translations, harming both client satisfaction and the platform's reputation. Furthermore, the reliance on speed of response opens the door for sophisticated bots or scripts to automatically claim assignments, leaving qualified human translators at a disadvantage. This undermines fair competition and potentially leads to a decline in overall translation quality. 2. Another annoying thing is that sometimes inconsistence can be found among accepted TMs. > > My experience with Lilt has been positive on the whole. The platform's interface is intuitive and user-friendly, particularly the in-context editor which allows for efficient translation. The payment system is generally reliable and transparent, which is crucial for freelancers. Finally, the availability of various project types and clients offers some degree of diversification in workload. The one thing I think needs to be improved is its task assignment mechanism. A more sophisticated approach would prioritize factors beyond speed of response. A system incorporating translator profiles, skills matching, and project-specific qualifications would be fairer, more efficient, and ultimately contribute to higher-quality translations. ----- ### "A good concept where some things fail" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *06 April 2025* | Translation & Localization | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The Contextual AI engine works really well, and the payments are allways on time. > > **Cons**: Project teams raffle many jobs, who is the fastes in accepting gets the Job. This creates an atmosphere of competition instead a team consciousness. > > The tool works well, the job lists are a bit unclear, the jobs change their position each time you open them. Quality of fuzzy matches is often low, so I have the impression that quality control in German is failing. Seems there is no competent linguistic instance to oversee overall quality- ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/204322/lilt?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/204322/lilt) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data