--- description: Learn more about Phoenix Ortho EHR price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in South Africa. Read reviews from verified users and discover similar tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Phoenix Ortho EHR Price, Reviews & Features - Capterra South Africa 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Electronic Medical Records Software](/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) > [Phoenix Ortho EHR](/software/162065/phoenix-ortho) # Phoenix Ortho EHR Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.za/software/162065/phoenix-ortho Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/162065/phoenix-ortho?page=2) > EHR software that helps orthopedic specialists conduct billing code audits, improve workflow and manage medical images. > > Verdict: Rated **3.8/5** by 14 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Phoenix Ortho EHR? Orthopedics ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **3.8/5** | 14 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 3.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Phoenix Ortho - **Location**: Dallas, US ## Commercial Context - **Pricing Details**: Please contact Phoenix Ortho for pricing details. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Appointment Management - Care Plan Management - Charting - Claims Management - Clinic Interoperability - Clinical Notes - Coding Assistance - Customizable Templates - Decision Support Software - E-Prescribing - EMR/EHR - HIPAA Compliant - Insurance Eligibility Verification - Inventory Management - Medical Billing - Patient Portal - Patient Records Management - Patient Scheduling - Physician Scheduling ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Electronic Medical Records Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) ## Related Categories - [Electronic Medical Records Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) - [Medical Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/20029/medical-practice-management/software) - [Orthopedic EMR Software](https://www.capterra.co.za/directory/32633/orthopedic-emr/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Fusion](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/136876/pediatric-therapy-emr) — 4.3/5 (708 reviews) 2. [Alleva](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/180899/alleva) — 4.5/5 (282 reviews) 3. [Carepatron](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/195467/care-patron) — 4.4/5 (843 reviews) 4. [ModMed](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/124590/ema) — 4.4/5 (363 reviews) 5. [AestheticsPro](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/93446/aestheticspro) — 4.4/5 (619 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Phoenix Orthopedic" — 5.0/5 > **Shawnalee** | *17 March 2025* | Medical Practice | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: We used this for keeping medical records within our orthopedic clinic. It was very visually appealing, straight forward with medical records, and easy to use. > > **Cons**: There was some user integration issues with our scheduling system \& this EHR. Otherwise, it was a great system. > > It was positive. It was a very easy to use system and it did not present any major issues with us. ----- ### "Phoenix has many top features" — 4.0/5 > **Kelsey** | *01 February 2019* | Medical Practice | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: There are a lot of features you get 'out of the box' as they say. There is a lot built in to the software that doesn't require us to make changes to. Additionally, many of the features can be customized to our specific needs. > > **Cons**: Getting a response for support or a problem is almost impossible. The patient portal is also quite difficult to use. It would be better if the paperwork was more easily changed to fit our specific needs. > > Overall we are happy with our choice of Phoenix. ----- ### "Great system for mid-sized orthopedics companies" — 4.0/5 > **Matt** | *06 February 2024* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: -Ortho specific -Physicians find it easy to use -Training new employees is simple -Support is solid > > **Cons**: -Not an "all-in-on" solution for PM and EMR -No option to have patients do their own HPI (but I believe this is coming in the near future) > > Our experience with Phoenix has been great. We scaled from a 10-provider practice to 17 providers on this software. The support team is solid. They know the product. You will be dealing with one person, not an 800 number if anything goes wrong. They were built for ortho. The providers find it very easy to use and generally enjoy working in the system. The only knock is that it's not an all-in-one solution, which creates the need to bridge the clinical side of house to billing. We use an encounter form process to accomplish that, which works for us. Overall, this is a very solid company for the right size practice and presents a great value for the money. You can build a successful practice and scale with Phoenix as a partner. ----- ### "Phoenix Ortho" — 4.0/5 > **Amanda** | *18 January 2024* | Medical Practice | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is very user friendly and specific to each provider. This allows each one of them to, in essence, have their own EHR, built the way they want it. Being Ortho specific makes it easier to make changes that will make sense for all of their customers. > > **Cons**: E-prescribing process does not flow well. It takes many steps to get an appropriate, current medication list in the chart for a patient. ----- ### "Might be Ok if they ever finish it" — 1.0/5 > **Kenneth** | *23 January 2014* | Medical Practice | Recommendation rating: 1.0/10 > > **Pros**: I have to say that due to problems with the software, my staff and I had several calls and emails into support, and they did respond relatively fast. Sadly, their response was usually that the software couldn't do what we asked and that we should try and find some workaround. > > **Cons**: Although one could never expect any one piece of software to be a perfect fit for everyone, I believe that my experience would be typical, because I have a general orthopedic practice. The opinions held within this review were based on my use of the software for almost a year (I have since discontinued use of the software and returned to paper charts. I have also resumed my shopping for an EHR). My first main complaint is that although the software can handle a patient encounter with more than one body part, when you do have more than one body part, the software becomes much harder to use and errors get easily introduced into the record (mostly right \<--\> left). When entering the diagnosis, the side defaults to the body part selected on the "main" page. So if you want to enter a diagnosis for the right shoulder, left knee, right radiculopathy, etc., you either have to click back to the main page and select the body part or you have to make sure you change the side. On a followup visit, I asked them why the computer doesn't already know that the shoulder diagnosis is on the right, they said that I have to fix that each time. In addition, my surgery scheduler tells me that if a patient has a bilateral problem (such as bilateral shoulder injuries), when surgery is recommended, there was no obvious indication in the reports or order as to which side upon which I desired to operate. We had many complaints regarding the way the software handled patients with multiple problems at a single visit. For example, you couldn't post a surgery on a knee and a shoulder at the same visit. You can't order physical therapy on more than one area without editing the prescription each time. There were many problems with right/left when a patient came in with bilateral problems. When we would call for support, they would tell us that most of their users saw patients with only one problem. In my practice, I see a lot of major injuries. My patients rarely have one problem. It isn't uncommon for a patient to have a neck, back, knee and shoulder injury (as an example); this software was very difficult to use in that situation. Also, one odd problem with the software was that if the same exam applied to two body parts, sometimes the final report who show two different findings for the same exam. This is extremely embarrassing, especially when you have to explain this in a deposition. For example: if a patient has a cervical injury and a wrist injury with medial nerve numbness. In the cervical exam section, normal sensation will be documented; however, in the wrist exam, there will be numbness along a median nerve distribution. As far as documenting and reporting of the physical exam, there were several flaws with the software. With the cervical exam, it was difficult to document myelopathy. That had to be typed in the comment section each time. The physical exam section was minimally modifiable. In addition, if I saw a patient with a neck injury, it was awkward to document abdominal or lower extremity reflexes. Those are documented in the lower extremity or lumbar exam screens. As a result, you would have to add the lumbar as a problem (even if it wasn't) in order to document those areas. When I suggested various modifications to the exam the developers created, support told me that I had to use the exam as they had it and add anything else in the comment section. Also, many of my patients' diagnoses are associated with a particular date of onset (or date of injury). I need that in the history (especially in work comp charts). To have a date of injury in the history, you have to "click" on their data entry tree. This is a problem if the injury was in another decade (such as 2009). When entering the date, you click on "Onset of Symptoms" then click on "Acute with Injury" then click on "On Date." Then you are defaulted to a calendar of this month and year. So you click on "Year," and it shows you a list of years in this decade (i.e.. 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 etc.) so then you click on "Decade". Then you click on the 2000-2009 decade, then click "2009," then click the month, and then click the day. I asked them why the computer can't remember that the patient fractured their forearm in 2009. Why do I have to remind the computer of that each visit? Things like date of onset and side should be associated with the diagnosis so they don't have to be entered each time. Another issue is that to use some of the functions of the software, you have to give the user local admin rights on the computer. This is lazy programming. Check with your IT guy; he won't like that at all\! They should have set up the software so that it only required specific privileges, not Admin privileges. Another major problem was that the reports had major formatting issues and they were not customizable by the end user. So the office notes generated looked amateur. Chiropractor software was generating more professional reports than mine. I was so embarrassed, especially if my report was being used as evidence in a personal injury case. Another problem was that each time I set up a surgery, I needed to send that "task" to a specific employee. So each time I'd have to select that person out of a 15 person pull-down list. Why can't the software remember that all surgery requests should go to employee A for scheduling? This may seem minor, but it is an example of how amateur this software feels. It is a generally accepted standard that when entering username and password, the cursor starts in the username field. You type the username, hit the Tab key, then type the password and then press the Return key - not with Phoenix Ortho. After entering the username, the first Tab takes you to a useless checkbox, and the second TAB takes you to the password field. So you have to be cognizant of that when you are working in Phoenix Ortho, because it is different than all other software. Also, there was no internal consistency in the software. Certain activities had contextual pull-down menus, whereas others had pop-up dialog boxes. As a result, the software was very annoying to use on a large screen, because in many cases where a contextual menu would work great, they'd use a pop-up, and I found that my mouse was chasing down pop-up boxes all over my screen. It is true that you can scan in documents (such as imaging reports), but there was no way to search for them; there was no way to add keywords; you couldn't even sort them alphabetically or by date. So results were in random order, and it took forever to get information out of the software. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/162065/phoenix-ortho?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.za/software/162065/phoenix-ortho) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data